Brad’s Fashion Bible Review

“Brad P’s Fashion Bible” is by far the best dating guru living today.

Whether you’re good with women or not, you should get this book. I am actually really good with fashion, but Brad P is an expert with out competition.

I was attracting women to me with fashion before I bought this book by Brad P. It was amazing the results I got from getting my fashion in order. My results became insane after I put Brad P’s theory into my fashion; I had women approaching me in clubs. No joke!

First and foremost: Brad P’s social intelligence is bar none. I just don’t see anyone else with Brad Ps social intelligence, ever. I actually witnessed him pull a woman from a club in 10 minutes flat. Yeah, I know, it’s crazy. He has real credibility here.

Amazingly, that’s not even the point. Brad P takes a detailed look at the science of fashion as it relates to women. I like they way the book teaches you this in a simple manner. outstanding!

The Sexy Stereotypes

A section of the book is dedicated to the “sexy stereotype where you can cast a sexual image to women to know that you are sexually potent and this will attract women. Brad P also covers the areas of male power, being attractive to the feminine eye, being an elite, and having the ability to have resources (even if you don’t).

What I found is that I was dressing in the type Brad calls “normal well dressed.” When I switched to “sexy stereotype” my success tripled.

Men’s Inability To Change And Improve

Probably one of the biggest point in Brad P’s Fashion Bible is his knowledge of most men who are really bad with women, and their consequent lack of willingness to get this fashion thing down.

I understand most men’s difficulty in changing the way they dress as does Brad P in a section where he talks about men’s reluctance to change their style.

Brad P’s book helps men come to terms with this position.

The Science of Fashion

Brad’s Fashion Bible reserves a section for this delicate issue. In the “The Nice Guy Look,” Brad deals directly on this issue and shows you how bad it really is if you don’t change that image.

If guys can just get past this “sticking point” really the woman will start coming to you!

I have to say my superlative secret is my fashion to attract women; I get approached or noticed my women everywhere I go. Women always complement me on something I am wearing. Now, at parties, clubs, bars, and any social milieu, I am always the one that is dressed better. The way you look will help you get the girl; I know I’ve had my share.

It has literally taken me years to figure this out. Just get your hands on the eBook and save yourself a lot of headaches.

That’s why I strongly recommend Brad’s Fashion Bible, because the faster you can get this part of the dating equation mastered, the more women you will have in the “pipeline.”

Understanding the Bible, Book Summary

Chapter 1: The Purpose of the Bible

The author laments that people normally ask varying questions and employ diverse strategies to read the Bible. Others, he asserts, give up Bible reading altogether or never start reading because they cannot see the relevance of accounts of people in the distant part for them today. However, Christians believe that although the Bible has a wide variety of human authors, there is a single unifying theme for a divine Author. It is perhaps most succinctly presented by Paul to Timothy in I Tim. 3:15-17. The apostle brings together the origin and object of Scripture. The writer investigates the nature of the Bible’s usefulness and analysis three words used Paul – salvation, Christ and faith.

Stott presents the central idea that the supreme purpose of the Bible is to instruct its readers for salvation, implying that Scripture has a practical purpose which is moral than intellectual. Since this is neither scientific nor literary, the Bible could be rightly seen as a book neither of literature nor of philosophy, but of salvation. He notes that salvation, in addition to forgiveness of sins, includes the entire sweep of God’s purpose to redeem and restore mankind and indeed all creation. The main thrust is God’s love for the rebels who deserve nothing but judgment.

God’s plan, originating in His grace, Stott emphasizes, took shape before time began. He made a covenant of grace with Abraham, promising through his prosperity to bless all the families of the earth. The rest of the Old Testament tabulates His gracious dealings with Abraham’s posterity, the Israelites. Although they rejected His Word, He never casts them out. In the New Testament, the apostles emphasize that forgiveness is possible only through Christ’s sin-bearing death, and a new birth leading to a new life only through the Spirit of Christ. The New Testament authors insist that though people have already in one sense been saved, in another sense their salvation still lies in the future. Conceived in a past eternity, achieved at a point in time and historically worked in human experience, it will reach its consummation in the eternity of the future.

Stott’s hypothetical argument is that if salvation is available through Christ and if Scripture concerns salvation, then scripture is full of Christ. Christ’s assertion was that in each of the three divisions of the Old Testament, the Law (the Pentateuch/First five books of the Bible), the prophets [history books or former prophets (Joshua, Judges, Samuel and Kings) and latter prophets (major-Isaiah to Daniel- and minor prophets- Hosea to Malachi)] and the Psalms (writings), there were things concerning Him and all these things must be fulfilled. Discovering Christ in the New Testament is not strange. The gospels, acts, epistles and revelation vividly portray Him. In the latter for instance, He appears as a glorified man, a lamb, majestic rider on a white horse and a Heavenly Bridegroom. The survey of the two testaments demonstrates that we must turn to the Bible if we want to know about Christ and His salvation. The writer puts faith in its right perspective after lamenting its misuse.

Chapter 2: The Land of the Bible

Stott observes that some knowledge of the historical and geographical setting of God’s people is absolutely necessary to put the study in perspective. The reason for the recording of God’s dealing with Israel in general and individuals in particular is to teach us (Rom. 15:4; I Cor. 10:11). Scripture refuses to conceal the faults of great characters in the Old and New Testaments.

The writer dismisses the claim that Jerusalem was the centre of the earth as a sheer geographical nonsense even though Christians would defend it theologically. However, Christians believe in the providence of God whose choice of Palestine cannot be an accident. An obvious feature is that it acts as a kind of bridge between Europe, Asia and Africa. Strategically, therefore, God set Jerusalem in the centre of the nations (Ez.5:5).

When God told Moses that He’d bring the Israelites out of Egypt into Canaan, He described it as good and spacious. Joshua and Caleb, unlike the other spies, confirm that the land was exceedingly good. Several popular expressions were used to refer to the whole country from north to south. The commonest simply is from Dan to Beersheba. Stott suggests that perhaps a simpler way to remember Palestine is to visualize four strips of the country between the sea and the desert – the coastland, the central highlands, the Jordan valley and the eastern tableland.

Stott affirms that God’s revelation as the ‘Shepherd of Israel’ was natural because of the intimate relationship which grew over the years between the Palestinian shepherds and the sheep since the latter were kept more for wool than for mutton. Jesus further developed the metaphor, calling himself the Good Shepherd. Though many Israelite farmers kept livestock, even more cultivated the soil. The three main products of Palestine (grain, new wine and oil) are normally grouped together in many biblical passages (Deut. 7:13; Joel 2:19). The writer notes the tremendous importance of the early (autumn) rain and the latter (spring) rain to harvest. Without them the corn would remain thin and desiccated. God Himself linked the rain and the harvest together and promised them to His obedient people. Three annual festivals had an agricultural as well as a religious significance. In them they worshiped the God of nature and the God of grace as the one God, Lord of the earth and of Israel. They are the Feast of the Passover, the Feast of the First fruits/Harvest and the Feast of Booths/Tabernacles/Ingathering. The observance of these was obligatory. They commemorated the signal mercies of the covenant God of Israel who first redeemed His people from their Egyptian bondage and gave them the Law at Sinai and then provided for them during their wanderings in the wilderness. From another standpoint, they are all harvest festivals marking respectively the beginning of the barley harvest, the end of the grain harvest and the end of the fruit harvest. Stott’s use of three maps showing the Fertile Crescent, the historical and natural regions of Palestine clearly puts the study in perspective.

Chapter 3: The Story of the Bible – Old Testament

Stott observes that Christianity is essentially a historical religion and that God’s revelation is an unfolding historical situation, through Israel and Jesus Christ. The writer forcefully argues that biblical historians quickly sank in the quicksand of subjectivity since they were writing ‘sacred’ history, the story of God’s dealings with a particular people for a particular purpose. They were selective in their choice of materials and in the eyes of the secular historian, unbalanced in their presentation of it. Other regions were only included if they impinge on the fortunes of relatively unknown Israel and Judah. Great heroes were either scarcely mentioned or introduced obliquely. Christians believe that Christ’s advent is the watershed of history, dividing time into BC and AD and the Bible into the Old and New Testaments.

The order of the thirty nine books is dictated neither by the date of their composition, nor the date of the subject matter but their literary genre. Broadly speaking, the three types of literature in the Old Testament are history, poetry and prophecy. The historical books (Pentateuch) and then twelve more tell a continuous story. After these come five books of Hebrew poetry or wisdom (from Job to Song of Solomon) and finally the seventeen prophetical books [five major prophets (Isaiah to Daniel) and twelve ‘minor’ prophets (Hosea to Malachi)]. Stott describes the creation, observing that God was not a national mascot. He observes that several forms of pre-Adamic ‘homicid’ seem to have existed previously for thousands of years and believes Adam was the first ‘homo divinus’. The writer highlights the call of Abraham, the groan of the Israelites under Pharaoh and their eventual release. Subjectively dismissing the Red Sea crossed by the Israelites as probably some shallow water, he observes that the miracle lay in the fact that God sent it as the moment Moses stretched his hand. At Sinai, God gave Israel three precious gifts – a renewed covenant, a moral law and atoning sacrifices.

The Israelites wandered in the wilderness and none of the adult generation which brought a negative report – except Joshua and Caleb – entered the promised land. God appointed Joshua to succeed Moses. Israel’s history was a cycle of backsliding, oppression and deliverance. God raised judges who combined several functions. The greatest was Samuel who remonstrated with the Israelites and warned them that future kings would be oppressive. They did not listen and Saul became the first king, ending the theocratic state ruled by God directly. David was designated heir to the throne of the disobedient Saul. As king, David unified Israel and devoted himself to God. His son Solomon, who succeeded him, did not love God with all his heart. The kingdom was divided into the northern kingdom of Israel and the southern kingdom of Judah after his reign.

Stott highlights the Babylonian captivity which lasted for fifty years. The hardest trial was religious for the Israelites felt spiritually lost in their separation from temple and sacrifice. Ezekiel was among them as a guide. Israel had to wait for another four hundred years before the Messiah was born. Throughout the uneasy period of Maccabean rule, important movements were developing in the Jewish community which later hardened into the various religious parties of our Lord’s day.

The writer, in addition to end notes, arranges dates in chronological order at the end of the discourse.

Chapter 4: The Story of the Bible – New Testament

Stott observes that it is an account of the words and deed of Jesus of Nazareth. The gospels, strictly speaking, are testimony and not biography, bearing witness to Christ and the good news of salvation. He highlights five reasons why the gospels would be approached with confidence and not with suspicion. Four evangelists were Christians, honest men to whom truth matters. They give evidence of their impartiality. Thirdly, they claim either to be themselves eye-witnesses of Jesus or to report the experience of eye witnesses. Jesus seems to have taught like a Jewish rabbi. Lastly, if God said and did something absolutely unique and decisive through Jesus, it is inconceivable that he would have allowed it to be lost in the mists of antiquity. The gospels tell the same story, yet differently. The first three are usually known as Synoptic Gospels because their stories run parallel and present a synoptic – that is, similar- account of Jesus’ life. Every reader of John’s gospel is immediately struck by the differences between it and the synoptic gospels in subject matter, theological emphasis, literary styles and vocabulary. Commenting on the birth and youth of Jesus, each evangelist begins his story at a different place. Mark plunges almost immediately into Jesus’ public ministry, heralded as it was by John the Baptist. John goes to the other extreme and reaches back into a past eternity to the pre-incarnate existence of Christ. He was brought up in Nazareth in Galilee. The only incident from His boyhood recorded in the Gospels took place when he reached the age of twelve and was taken up to Jerusalem for the Passover. He eventually noted that His duty is to spend time in the Father’s house. Growing in wisdom and stature in favour with God and man, the evangelists did not give a strictly chronological account of the Lord’s public ministry which appears to last approximately for three years. The writer refers to the first year as the year of obscurity, the second year of popularity and the third the year of adversity.

Stott traces Jesus’ final hours of liberty which he spent privately with the twelve disciples in a furnished room. In the garden of Gethsemane, He prayed with an agony of desire that He might be spared having to drink ‘this cup’. Crucifixion was a horrible form of execution. How Jesus viewed and endured his ordeal is shown by the seven words which He spoke from the cross. Finally, He commended His Spirit to the Father, indicating that His death was a voluntary, self-determined act. The writer traces the story of the resurrection on Easter Day. The Lord eventually began to appear to people. These appearances continued for forty days. The last one took place on the Mount of Olives. After promising them power to be His witnesses once the Holy Spirit had come upon them, and having blessed them, He was taken up into Heaven.

The writer vividly highlights the dawn of the infant church. Waiting for the promise, the Holy Spirit came and filled them all. Stott affirms that Pentecost must also be understood as a fundamentally missionary event when three thousand people were converted, baptized and added to the church that day. Unable to crush it by external pressure (persecution), the devil tried to undermine it from within. The writer also comments on Paul’s missionary journeys, his arrest and journey to Rome and the deeds of the apostles after the book of Acts. The map of Paul’s missionary journey and significant dates to remember at the end of the chapter further illuminates the discussion.

Chapter 5: The Message of the Bible

Stott re-echoes that the message of the Bible concerns salvation through Christ. He expresses the Bible’s own claims that it contains neither a ragbag of miscellaneous contradictions, nor a gradual evolution of human ideas but a progressive revelation of truth by God. The author concedes that there are several differences between the Old and New Testament revelations. The revelation was given at different times, to different people and in different modes. This notwithstanding, God is the ultimate author of both testaments. The Bible is essentially a revelation of God. There are two basic truths about God to consider which Scripture emphasizes. The first is that He is a living and sovereign God and the second is that He is consistent and does not change like shifting shadows. He is constantly contrasted with the dead idols of heathenism. Stott further observes that the principal way in which the living God has expressed Himself is in grace. The God of the Bible is the God of all grace (1 Pet. 5:10). Grace is God’s free unmerited people. God’s grace is covenant grace. The writer further investigates what may be described as three stages in the outpouring of God’s covenant, expressed in the three dynamic words – redemption, adoption and glorification.

Redemption was originally not a theological but a commercial word. To redeem, Stott confirms, is to purchase someone’s freedom, to recover by payment of a price something which had been lost. New Testament authors draw an analogy between the Passover, which initiated Israel’s redemption from Egypt, and the death of Christ which has secured our redemption from sin. The New Testament fulfillment is dramatic. John showed in his gospel that by one reckoning Jesus was shedding His blood on the cross at the precise time when the Passover lambs were being killed. Christ, the Lamb of God, offered Himself as our Passover sacrifice. Now He is seated at God’s right hand, resting from His finished work of redemption and crowned with glory and honour. He has won an eternal redemption for us.

Redemption from sin by Christ’s blood is to be redeemed from slavery and adopted into sonship. It is because we are sons that God sent the Spirit of His Son into our hearts (Gal. 4:6). To be a son is to be an heir. Suffering is the pledge of glory. This leads to the third stage in God’s unfolding plan of salvation, which is glorification.

The New Testament is full of Christian hope. It reminds us that in spite of what we are presently enjoying, there is still far more to come. Paul referred to it as the hope of glory which has several meanings outlined by Stott. Firstly, the return of Christ (Matt. 24:27); secondly, the resurrection in which our incorruptible body will be a body of glory like Christ’s (Phil.3:21; I Cor.15:35-37). Thirdly, the judgment. We shall be judged according to our works (Matt. 16:27; Rev. 20:11-15). Fourthly, the new universe will make everything new.

Stott brilliantly compares Genesis and Revelation. He observes that the Bible begins with creation of the universe and ends with the recreation of the universe. It begins with the fall of man and concludes in a garden with Paradise regained. God’s kingdom will be ultimately consummated. All creation is subject to Him. His redeemed, adopted and glorified will share His reign for ever (Rev. 22:5).

Chapter 6: The Authority of the Bible

Stott attributes the confusion of the contemporary church to the lack of an agreed authority and argues that it will never recover its moral or mission unless it first recovers the source of its authority. Christians normally use three interrelated but distinct words in connection with the special nature of Scripture – revelation, inspiration and authority. Inspiration indicates the chief mode God has chosen to reveal Himself – in nature, Christ and by speaking to particular people. Authority is the power or weight which Scripture possesses because of what it is, namely a divine revelation given by divine inspiration. It carries God’s authority.

The writer identifies three disclaimers which may anticipate objections and disarm possible criticism. Firstly, the process of inspiration was not mechanical since God did not treat the human authors as tape recorders or dictating machines but as living and responsible beings. His second is that every word is true in its context and Job is cited as a classic example when he noted that he spoke of things he did not understand. The ‘anthropomorphic’ descriptions of God, representing Him in human form and referring to His eyes, ears, outstretched arm, mighty hand, fingers, mouth, breath and nostrils. We do not interpret these literally simply because God is a Spirit and therefore has no body. His third disclaimer concerns the nature of the inspired text of Scripture, which alone can be regarded as God’s written word. This is the original Hebrew or Greek as it came from the author’s hand. He argues that no special inspiration/authority is claimed for any particular translation as a translation. He dismisses the absence of the actual autograph presumably as God’s deliberate providence probably to prevent us giving superstitious response to pieces of paper.

Stott further treats the grounds Christians base assurance that the Bible is God’s written word, originating with God and authoritative for men. Firstly, the historic Christian churches have consistently maintained and defended the divine origin of Scripture. Secondly, the prophets introduced their oracles with formulae like ‘Thus says the Lord’ or ‘The Word of the Lord came to me saying…’ The third is supplied by the readers of Scripture. Fourthly, the authority of Scripture is believed because of what Jesus said. He gave His reverent assent to the authority of the Old Testament Scripture for He submitted to its authority in His personal conduct, the fulfillment of His mission and in His controversies. He endorsed the New Testament differently. This is evident in His appointment of His apostles. Secondly, they had an eye-witness experience of Christ. Thirdly, they had an extraordinary inspiration of the Holy Ghost. Lastly, according to Stott, they were empowered to work miracles. Our impression of the uniqueness of the apostles is confirmed in two ways. Firstly, they themselves knew it and so exhibit in the New Testament their self-conscious apostolic authority. Secondly, the early church recognized it, dismissing both the ‘kenosis’ and ‘accommodation’ theories.

Stott concludes by providing reasonable justification for submitting to the authority of Scripture. Firstly, it is a Christian thing to do. Secondly, to submit is not to pretend that there are no problems. However, problems do not overthrow our belief. Thirdly, it confirms the Lordship of Christ. It is reasonable to bow to the authority of Scripture because, according to Stott, we bow to the authority of Christ.

Chapter 7: The Literature of the Bible

Stott firmly asserts the infallibility of God’s Word and observes that He has given us three teachers to instruct and guide us. These include the enlightenment of the Holy Spirit, the Christian’s disciplined study and the teaching of the Church. Our foremost teacher is the Holy Spirit Himself and Stott believes He enlightens four groups of people – these are the regenerate/born again (John 3:3), the humble (Matt. 1:25-26), the obedient (John 7:17) and the communicative. He notes that if the Holy Spirit is our first and foremost teacher, there is a sense in which we ourselves must also teach ourselves, implying that we are expected to responsibly use our reason. The spiritual person, unlike the natural, has the mind of Christ. Paul’s conviction leads him to appeal to his readers’ reason. Stott argues that we cannot deny the place of the church in God’s plan to give His people a right understanding of His Word. The pastoral ministry is a teaching ministry. Luke gives a striking example of the role of the teacher (Acts 8:26-39). Although it is true that no human teacher is infallible, Stott vehemently argues that God has appointed teachers in His church for a purpose. It is our Christian duty to treat them with respect and to feed on God’s Word when faithfully exposed, cautiously examining the Scriptures to verity the truth of the teachings received (Acts 17:11). The writer believes that it is by receiving the illumination of the Spirit, reasoning and listening to the teaching of others in the Church that we grow in our understanding of Scripture.

Stott presents three principles which, he believes, will guide us in our interpretation of Scripture. These sound principles of interpretation include the natural, original and general sense. He refers to the natural sense as the principle of simplicity. One of our basic Christian convictions is that God is light. He chose human language as the vehicle of His self-revelation. He used the language of men in speaking to men. Since it is ordinary because human, we must study it like every other book, paying attention to the rules of vocabulary, grammar and syntax. Stott believes that no serious bible reader can escape the discipline of linguistic study. He recommends knowledge of the original languages (Hebrew and Greek), acquisition of an ‘accurate’ modern English version and an analytical concordance. Stott refers to the original sense as the principle of history since God chose to reveal Himself in a precise historical context. Questions that should be asked when the reading the Bible include, what did the author intend to convey by this? What is he actually asserting? What will his original hearers have understood him to have meant? This enquiry is commonly referred to as the ‘grammatico-historical method’ of interpretation. The writer critically considers the situation, style and language of writing. The third principle of interpretation is referred to as assortment of contributors. Divinely speaking, the entire Bible emanates from one mind. It therefore possesses an organic unity. Implicitly, we must approach Scripture with the confidence that God has spoken and has not contradicted Himself in so doing. Scripture, therefore, must be interpreted as one harmonious whole. These three principles, Stott believes, arise partly from the nature of God and Scripture as a plain historical, consistent communication from God to men. The solemn responsibility to make our treatment of Scripture coincide with our view of it is apparent.

Chapter 8: The Use of the Bible

Stott’s discussion on the use of the Bible to punctuate his text is deliberate. He observes that the conviction that our God is living and vocal, rather than dead and dumb, is basic to our Christian faith. He explains the sound reasons for accepting the Bible’s authority and sound principles to guide us in its interpretation. He identifies two possible attitudes to God’s Word. These are to either receive or reject it. Jesus similarly warned His contemporaries about their response to His teaching. Those who build on a rock and will ultimately survive the storms of adversity and judgement are those who demonstrate His teachings.

Stott outlines basic principles of Christian living, stressing the importance of quality time in meditating on God’s Word. The practice of daily quiet time, Bible reading and prayer, he reiterates, is an inviolable tradition which has certainly stood the test of time and brought immeasurable benefits to countless generations of Christians. Christian meditation and prayer, however brief, at the beginning of each day prepare us to bear the day’s responsibilities and face its temptations. Stott emphasized the importance of personal, family and group Bible studies, and above all the public exposition of Scripture in Church. He observes that very often the pew blames the pulpit when the former actually determines the kind of pulpit ministry it wants. Congregations, he argues, have far more responsibility than they commonly recognize for this kind of ministry they receive. He recommends that they should encourage their minister to expound Scripture. They should come to church in a receptive and expectant mood. They must come with their Bibles earnestly eager to hear what the Lord says through the lessons and sermon.

Stott lists five facets of the life-cycle of the doer of the Word. The first is worship which is impossible without a knowledge of the truth. Since it is a response to the truth of God, it is only God’s Word (His self-revelation) which evokes the worship of God. In all public worship, there should be Scripture reading and an exhortation/instruction based on it (Neh. 8:8; I Tim. 4:13). The Bible’s place in private and public worship is indispensable. The second is repentance. God’s Word tells us what we are as well as what He is, discloses to us our sin and calls us to confess and forsake it (Jer. 7:3). The third is faith which is an integral part of the Christian life. The fourth mark is obedience. Yet obedience involves submission (John 14:15) and this, Stott argues, appears to be out of fashion today. The fifth mark is witness. Stott impresses that truth cannot be concealed or monopolized.

The Bible then has an essential place in the life of a Christian simply because God’s revelation leads to worship, His warnings to repentance, His promises to faith, His commands to obedience and His truth to witness. God’s Word is indispensable to us, irrespective of the medium through which we receive it. Indeed, Stott realistically observes that it is through His Word alone that the human being becomes equipped for every good work (2 Tim. 3:17).

Nature’s Bible – The Anti Guru Guru

There’s even a quote in the bible, “as above, so below” and I think it refers to the waistline.

If there was ever a signpost to our spiritual, mental, social, career, family, financial and personal connection to something greater than ourselves, it is the health of our body.

Now, we need to make a very clear distinction. It’s not how our body looks that determines the connection, how big your boobs are, or how small you waist line or how many ripped muscles gint off the moonlight. No, that’s EGO.

Your body is nature’s bible and if you want to hear God, Allah, Buddha, Shiva, Spirit talk, listen to your body.

Got a sore knee? Is that really just a sore medial ligament or are you being stubborn in life?

Got migraine? Is that bad luck or is this blocked inspiration… blocking intuition?

Got the Flu? Is that a virus, need an anti biotic or is your body evolving… adapting… something to embrace rather than conquer?

Got Cancer? Been lying to yourself about something. Deep fear or guilt inside that you’ve thought you’ve dealt with but not?

Got Neck Pain? Judging something or someone but thought they’d never know it?


In the late 90’s, my colleague an I, (he’s one of the world’s leading Chiropractors and Cranial Behavioural Therapists) created a list of bio feedback signals that turned body awareness into a whole new science.

We listed ailments from constipation right thr0ugh to acne and hair loss and provided our understanding of the feedback we all could translate from those signals. Our body became “our guide” – No need for Holy Books, buildings or Preachers… Your body is the Guru. The Anti Guru Guru.

The Controversy

We shared the book with many communities, including indigenous communities. The stuff hit the fan almost immediately. Power groups including organised religions felt their grip on their “brand” of God slipping and argued against the idea claiming that “if you’re sick, God’s will” or “Your Fault.”

In one far North Canadian community where I’d been doing amazing work with youth and people at risk, my assistant and I got chased out of town by a bunch of radicals. Shot guns and all.. yahooo

The challenge is not so in the physical symptoms but the psychological mental health related bio-feedback.

Take the following examples:

Depression – the body saying change direction, change expectations.

Schizophrenia – split parenting, unchanged.

Bipolar – Two parents who did not collude on what behaviour would earn a child, acceptance.

ADHD – Comes as a result of single pointed focus on one thing, excluding all others, greed.

Alseimers – Regret

Parkinsons – Shame

Obesity – Rejection (self and other)

Multiple Sclerosis – No Self Respect

Tourette – Lacking Trust

And this list went on… controversial on one hand because it places some “responsibility back on the patient” for healing… it also implies a non medical, no psychological intervention in healing. A factor that, for the mainstream was threatening, unscientific and an open door to plagiarism and new age crap.

They were right.

Armed with our science, clients started to “give advice” based on their minimal knowledge – some even set up shop and offered to heal people.

We withdrew the list. Some people made money on the back of it, Like “intuitive healers” and books like “Heal Your Body” flipped the insight upside down. Suggesting the mind can heal the body, but really it’s the opposite, the body can heal the mind.


If LOVE is the way we connect to the higher forces of creation, whether this be Nature, the Universe, God, Allah or Whatever it’s label, then those things in our own mind that oppose LOVE must, in essence be the places we need to go explore.

It is easy to sit in a Church or Cave and feel all convinced of the Love that comes to bring health to life but, what exists in our mind as we walk just 100 meters from that place of worship, that is what determines our wellness, our connection. And so, it’s the body that sends us insight as to where we’ve blocked the love, for self, other, work, creator or blade of grass.

Saving whales is not love but can be. Having sex is not love, but can be. Work is not love but can be. There are so many avenues for our body to speak, and guide us to where our mind needs healing.

Some Real World Examples:

Marie came to me with her mum. Marie was 17, bone thin, anorexic, depressed and heavily medicated. Her mother was a sophisticated, educated woman, well dressed, elegant and highly intuitive. Since the age of 12 Marie had suffered illness after illness. Her body was wasting. She’d been diagnosed with Chronic Fatigue, mental health issues, depression, anorexia and more… this was not a good situation, and as always, I was a last ditch effort after all the mainstream had exhausted their options.

When the body goes into withdrawal, it’s a signpost to a mind that’s blocking love. The only question is what judgement has been implanted in that mind, and become stuck. And the amazing thing is, that this judgement is so easily changed, and healed, once it’s detected.

Like a detective in an adventure novel, I simply unravel the case. I go back to 12 to 18 months before the body started changing. I step through every variable, each week, each choice, each event looking for connections.

At the age of 10 Marie was a bring, athletic, inspired girl. Top of her class. By 14 she was ill, weal and depressed. What happened in between those years? With a loving mum by her side, we recounted those trivial moments, that can change a life. Boyfriends… na too big, too obvious. Sport.. na not inspiring enough for Marie… then, wham, we found it. At 12 Marie had to choose between Arts and Science in her education. She chose, or had chosen for her on the basis of her extreme capability in Science, the science stream. I asked Marie, “when you were five years old, what was your dream?”

Her mother replied, before Marie could raise her head, “fashion, she wanted to create a fashion label.” Then Marie lifted her eyes to mine, “I used to live for designing clothes, I loved drawing, sketching, imagining, different materials, different clothing, summer, winter, colours. But, they said my natural talent was science” She lowered her head again. Back to her withdrawn space.

Nothing needed to be said. Tears ran down my face. A young spirit crushed by a school system, a single choice, a lost dream and a family in distress. Her body, Nature’s Bible screaming Psalms from every cell, nobody listening. Till now.

I turned to the mother, and got a nod, a clearance to speak. Marie, what if tomorrow we wound the clock back, got you some education in fashion, mum funded a private sewing room for you to sketch and draw and sew and then create some of your own, and then others, fashion. Maybe a shop eventually after one or two showings and then…. and then…..

Now, you may think I was dangling a carrot in front of a child’s eyes, but that’s not true. I was reading her own heart, and speaking the dream she’d killed, judged and crushed. There was no chronic fatigue, anorexia or mental health problem, her body was simply doing and saying, what nature intended.

“Nature destroys (recycles) anything that does not fulfill its purpose”

The Goth Bible by Nancy Kilpatrick – A Review

Like the Christian bible, the goth Bible is disappointingly human. It serves as a passably good introduction to the goth subculture, but the information given is not given systematically. I do not recommend this book, unless you can get it for free; however, there is some good information inside. In the interest of giving a fair review, I will list the good points of the book before explaining my complaints with it.

The book is comprehensive. It covers all the main areas of the subculture: clothing styles, makeup, music, favorite books and authors, and adapting the subculture to grown-up life. If you’re looking for further reading, every chapter has a list of web links at the end, to various clothing retailers, auction sites, and information sites.

The goth Bible also features an interesting survey, apparently conducted on an internet forum, of about 200 currently practicing goths, on everything from sexuality to the Columbine massacre to their favorite music. Their opinions are interesting, and shed some more light onto the subculture. This survey is called “The † Section,” which is a little annoying until you get used to it, and appears along the margins of the page.

The book sheds some light on the evolution of goth style and philosophy. Many goths, for example, combine beauty ideals from different cultures: Egyptian, Victorian, Romantic, Celtic, Norse, and so on, to make their own ideal. You also don’t have to wear black to be goth, although most goths prefer black for various reasons, from “Memento Mori” to “It looks good on me.”

Every chapter starts with a picture of an extremely attractive, androgynous goth, which makes it worth at least browsing through. And if you’re looking for magazines on gothic fashion or retailers of gothic clothing, this is a good book to start with.

One of the best parts of the book is an exposition on the favorite colors of most goths. Black, of course, comes first, followed closely by silver, popular because it’s the color of the moon, the stars and thus of the night. I love color theory and understanding why people choose a certain color and not another one.

However, the book lacks a coherent structure, and features too many distracting asides. The fashion sections, for example, feature many profiles of modern-day designers, makeup manufacturers, goth jewellers, and so on. Some of the stories are neither germane nor interesting. A sentence or two, describing how different retailers emerged in the 1970s and 1980s, would suffice. This also leaves less room for a straightforward history of goth fashion, which would be more interesting and more comprehensive.

Transfiguration of the Dead by AngelhÄ(TM)ad.The author also interjects her own opinions as facts or quasi-facts. This is a serious fault, especially in a book called “The goth Bible.” I would have liked to see more attention paid to history and detail, not just of antecedents to gothic style (e.g. the Victorian era) but to modern gothic fashion.

How, for example, did the gothic style emerge from the punk and new wave movements? The author doesn’t say, although she does list some styles carried over from punk. How do goths relate to other subcultures, such as metalheads, punks, skinheads, hipsters, and so on? And what direction is the movement headed in? I put down this book with more questions than when I picked it up. Sometimes that’s a good thing; a great book can pique your interest in a topic and make you want to read more. But this book is not such a book.